Bergner v. Kaufmann

52 F. 818, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1971
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided November 29, 1892·Published

Opinion

Wheeler, District Judge.

This suit is brought upon design patent No. 20,347, dated November 25, 1890, for an album case set on a baseboard in an upright or nearly vertical position, having on its exterior an. oval, ornamental frame with an open center. The defendants put dimond-shaped mirrors, with such ornamental borders, on similar album cases. This style of album case is not new. The patent therefore must be held to be for an ornament upon the case as an article of manu[819] facture, under the third clause of section 4929, Rev. St., providing for design patents. Such ornamental frames were old, and well and generally known. The orator, who is the patentee, testifies, in answer to question 25: “I make no claim to be the designer of this frame.” Besides this, the defendants’ mirror does not look like this frame, and would not infringe the patent for this ornament.

The orator did not design an album case, proper; nor an ornament, proper, for an album case; but he appears to have conceived the idea of placing such an ornament upon an album case. The statute provides for patents upon designs for articles of manufacture, and for patents upon ornaments to be placed upon or worked into such articles, but does not appear to provide for a patent for the mere placing of an ornament on such articles. This patent does not, therefore, appear to be valid, or to be infringed. Let a decree be entered dismissing the bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bergner v. Kaufmann, 52 F. 818, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1971 (circtsdny 1892).

52 F. 818 (Bergner v. Kaufmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.