Bergmann v. Berger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bergmann v. Berger

218 A.D.2d 768, 631 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8844

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 22, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 218 A.D.2d 768 (Bergmann v. Berger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bergmann v. Berger, 218 A.D.2d 768, 631 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Motion by the petitioners for (a) leave to appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 2, 1995, which granted the oral motion of the Town of Huntington to quash a judicial subpoena duces tecum, and (b) a preference in the calendaring of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is,

Ordered that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is granted; the petitioners are granted leave to appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 2, 1995 (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; [c]; see also, Delloiaco v City of New York, 174 AD2d 705; Yetman v St. Charles Hosp., 112 AD2d 297; Cohalan v Johnson Elec. Constr. Corp., 105 AD2d 770); it is further,

Ordered that the branch of the motion which is for a preference is denied as academic; the appeal is decided herewith. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion by the petitioners for (a) leave to appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 2, 1995, which granted the oral motion of the Town of Huntington to quash a judicial subpoena duces tecum, and (b) a preference in the calendaring of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is,

Ordered that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is granted; the petitioners are granted leave to appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 2, 1995 (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; [c]; see also, Delloiaco v City of New York, 174 AD2d 705; Yetman v St. Charles Hosp., 112 AD2d 297; Cohalan v Johnson Elec. Constr. Corp., 105 AD2d 770); it is further,

Ordered that the branch of the motion which is for a preference is denied as academic; the appeal is decided herewith. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 A.D.2d 768, 631 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bergmann-v-berger-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack