Bergman v. TRAFICANT-BERGMAN

67 So. 3d 355

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bergman v. TRAFICANT-BERGMAN. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11355 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 20, 2011·No. 4D09-4835·Published

Opinion

67 So.3d 355 (2011)

No. 4D09-4835.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 20, 2011. Rehearing Denied September 9, 2011.

Charles Bergman, West Palm Beach, pro se.

Ralph T. White of Schutz & White, LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

MAY, C.J., WARNER and POLEN JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

67 So.3d 355 (2011)

No. 4D09-4835.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 20, 2011. Rehearing Denied September 9, 2011.

Charles Bergman, West Palm Beach, pro se.

Ralph T. White of Schutz & White, LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

MAY, C.J., WARNER and POLEN JJ., concur.

Bergman v. TRAFICANT-BERGMAN, 67 So. 3d 355 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

67 So. 3d 355 (Bergman v. TRAFICANT-BERGMAN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

67 So. 3d 355 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)