Bergman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Bergman v. State

96 S.W.2d 987, 131 Tex. Crim. 76, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 427

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 13, 1936

DocketNo. 18302.

StatusPublished

This text of 96 S.W.2d 987 (Bergman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bergman v. State, 96 S.W.2d 987, 131 Tex. Crim. 76, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 427 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for failing to stop and render aid; punishment, eighteen months in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. Appellant has some exceptions to the court’s charge, which we are not able to appraise in the absence of a statement of facts. This is true also of the requested instructions asked by the appellant.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for failing to stop and render aid; punishment, eighteen months in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. Appellant has some exceptions to the court’s charge, which we are not able to appraise in the absence of a statement of facts. This is true also of the requested instructions asked by the appellant.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 S.W.2d 987, 131 Tex. Crim. 76, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bergman-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.