Bergman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Bergman v. State

96 S.W.2d 987, 131 Tex. Crim. 76, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 427

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 13, 1936·No. No. 18302.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for failing to stop and render aid; punishment, eighteen months in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. Appellant has some exceptions to the court’s charge, which we are not able to appraise in the absence of a statement of facts. This is true also of the requested instructions asked by the appellant.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for failing to stop and render aid; punishment, eighteen months in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. Appellant has some exceptions to the court’s charge, which we are not able to appraise in the absence of a statement of facts. This is true also of the requested instructions asked by the appellant.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Bergman v. State, 96 S.W.2d 987, 131 Tex. Crim. 76, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 427 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

96 S.W.2d 987 (Bergman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.