Bergman v. Oudin

Washington Supreme Court

Bergman v. Oudin

70 P. 1135, 30 Wash. 703, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 729

Washington Supreme Court·Decided December 31, 1902·No. No. 4428·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case involves only questions of fact. Both parties have appealed from the findings of fact and' conclusions of law made by the court. After an examination of the lengthy record presented and the extensive briefs of counsel, we have concluded that substantial justice was meted out to the parties by the trial court, and are not inclined to interfere with its judgment. The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed, neither party obtaining costs on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case involves only questions of fact. Both parties have appealed from the findings of fact and' conclusions of law made by the court. After an examination of the lengthy record presented and the extensive briefs of counsel, we have concluded that substantial justice was meted out to the parties by the trial court, and are not inclined to interfere with its judgment. The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed, neither party obtaining costs on appeal.

Bergman v. Oudin, 70 P. 1135, 30 Wash. 703, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 729 (Wash. 1902).

Pincite

70 P. 1135 (Bergman v. Oudin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related