Bergman v. Oudin

Washington Supreme Court

Bergman v. Oudin

70 P. 1135, 30 Wash. 703, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 729

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 31, 1902

DocketNo. 4428

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 70 P. 1135 (Bergman v. Oudin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bergman v. Oudin, 70 P. 1135, 30 Wash. 703, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 729 (Wash. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case involves only questions of fact. Both parties have appealed from the findings of fact and' conclusions of law made by the court. After an examination of the lengthy record presented and the extensive briefs of counsel, we have concluded that substantial justice was meted out to the parties by the trial court, and are not inclined to interfere with its judgment. The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed, neither party obtaining costs on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case involves only questions of fact. Both parties have appealed from the findings of fact and' conclusions of law made by the court. After an examination of the lengthy record presented and the extensive briefs of counsel, we have concluded that substantial justice was meted out to the parties by the trial court, and are not inclined to interfere with its judgment. The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed, neither party obtaining costs on appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 P. 1135, 30 Wash. 703, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bergman-v-oudin-wash-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack