Bergling v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bergling v. Schwartz

97 A.D.3d 772, 948 N.Y.2d 563

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 25, 2012

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 A.D.3d 772 (Bergling v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bergling v. Schwartz, 97 A.D.3d 772, 948 N.Y.2d 563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon reargument, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which was pursuant to CPLR 306-b to extend their time to serve a summons and complaint upon the defendant Joel M. Schwartz (see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95 [2001]; Robles v Mirzakhmedov, 34 AD3d 554, 554-555 [2006]; see also Thompson v City of New York, 89 AD3d 1011, 1012 [2011]; Samet v Binson, 67 AD3d 988, 989 [2009]; Matter of Mobilevision Med. Imaging Servs., LLC v Sinai Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, P.C., 66 AD3d 685, 686 [2009]; Rosenzweig v 600 N. St., LLC, 35 AD3d 705 [2006]). Rivera, J.P., Eng, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon reargument, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which was pursuant to CPLR 306-b to extend their time to serve a summons and complaint upon the defendant Joel M. Schwartz (see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95 [2001]; Robles v Mirzakhmedov, 34 AD3d 554, 554-555 [2006]; see also Thompson v City of New York, 89 AD3d 1011, 1012 [2011]; Samet v Binson, 67 AD3d 988, 989 [2009]; Matter of Mobilevision Med. Imaging Servs., LLC v Sinai Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, P.C., 66 AD3d 685, 686 [2009]; Rosenzweig v 600 N. St., LLC, 35 AD3d 705 [2006]). Rivera, J.P., Eng, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A.D.3d 772, 948 N.Y.2d 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bergling-v-schwartz-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack