Bergland v. Regan

199 A.D.2d 812, 605 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12218
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s request for disability retirement benefits.

We reject petitioner’s claim that respondent erred in determining that the incident at issue was not an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 605. An injury is not accidental if it is sustained while performing routine duties and not resulting from unexpected events. Here, there is substantial evidence to support respondent’s conclusion that petitioner’s alleged injury emanated from risks inherent in petitioner’s regular duties and that it therefore did not constitute an accident.

Weiss, P. J., Cardona, White, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bergland v. Regan, 199 A.D.2d 812, 605 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

199 A.D.2d 812 (Bergland v. Regan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roach v. McCall
251 A.D.2d 941 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)