Bergland v. Edwin Gould Foundation for Children

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bergland v. Edwin Gould Foundation for Children

90 A.D.2d 474, 455 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18475

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 90 A.D.2d 474 (Bergland v. Edwin Gould Foundation for Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bergland v. Edwin Gould Foundation for Children, 90 A.D.2d 474, 455 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18475 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mercorella, J.), entered January 7, 1982, denying defendant Lakeside’s motion for a change of venue from Bronx to Rockland County, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. While we disagree with Special Term’s finding that the injured plaintiff, Michael Bergland, was a Bronx resident, venue was properly placed in that county since plaintiff Henrietta Bergland, who has asserted a cause of action for loss of services and medical expenses, is and was at the time of the commencement of the action a resident of The Bronx. (See CPLR 503, subd [a].) We find no abuse of discretion with respect to Special Term’s determination that a change of venue to Rockland County is not required for the convenience of witnesses. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mercorella, J.), entered January 7, 1982, denying defendant Lakeside’s motion for a change of venue from Bronx to Rockland County, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. While we disagree with Special Term’s finding that the injured plaintiff, Michael Bergland, was a Bronx resident, venue was properly placed in that county since plaintiff Henrietta Bergland, who has asserted a cause of action for loss of services and medical expenses, is and was at the time of the commencement of the action a resident of The Bronx. (See CPLR 503, subd [a].) We find no abuse of discretion with respect to Special Term’s determination that a change of venue to Rockland County is not required for the convenience of witnesses. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich and Milonas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A.D.2d 474, 455 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bergland-v-edwin-gould-foundation-for-children-nyappdiv-1982.