Bergin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bergin v. State

109 So. 3d 300, 2013 WL 811541, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3534

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 6, 2013·No. No. 4D12-2750·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion. However, the trial court is directed to correct the scrivener’s errors in the written judgment and disposition orders for case number 06-15870CF10A, which misstate the offenses appellant was convicted of and list the wrong degree for these offenses. Appellant was convicted of attempted strong arm robbery and attempted burglary of a dwelling, third degree felonies.

GROSS, TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion. However, the trial court is directed to correct the scrivener’s errors in the written judgment and disposition orders for case number 06-15870CF10A, which misstate the offenses appellant was convicted of and list the wrong degree for these offenses. Appellant was convicted of attempted strong arm robbery and attempted burglary of a dwelling, third degree felonies.

GROSS, TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Bergin v. State, 109 So. 3d 300, 2013 WL 811541, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3534 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

109 So. 3d 300 (Bergin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related