Bergin v. Deering

24 N.Y.S. 35, 70 Hun 381, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 381, 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 894
New York Supreme Court·Decided June 30, 1893·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order adjudging the defendant guilty of -a civil contempt of court. The order does not describe the acts which were committed or omitted by the defendant which constituted the contempt, nor is there any adjudication-that any particular acts were done or omitted which amounted to a contempt. The order does not show what the defendant shall do, or how much he shall pay, if anything, in order to purge himself from contempt, nor is it adjudicated that the acts done or omitted impair the rights of any party to the action. These three provisions -are necessary parts of every order adjudging a party guilty of a civil -contempt.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bergin v. Deering, 24 N.Y.S. 35, 70 Hun 381, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 381, 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 894 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

24 N.Y.S. 35 (Bergin v. Deering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Mittlemann v. Fitzgerald
177 Misc. 677 (New York Supreme Court, 1941)
Dowd v. Dowd
237 A.D. 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)