Bergh v. Poupard

Michigan Court of Chancery

Bergh v. Poupard

1 Walk. Ch. 5

DecidedApril 15, 1842

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Walk. Ch. 5 (Bergh v. Poupard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bergh v. Poupard, 1 Walk. Ch. 5 (Mich. Ct. App. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The 110th rule of the Court requires bills of this description to be verified by the oath of thg [6]*6complainant, or in case of his absence from the State, or other sufficient cause shown, by the oath of his agent or Attorney. Where the bill is verified by the complainant’s agent, who is not also the Solicitor of the complainant, the jurat should state the person verifying to be the agent of the complainant; but where, as in the present case, it is verified by the oath of the complainant’s solicitor, the Court will take notice of that fact from the record and proceedings in the cause.

The motion must be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

The 110th rule of the Court requires bills of this description to be verified by the oath of thg [6]*6complainant, or in case of his absence from the State, or other sufficient cause shown, by the oath of his agent or Attorney. Where the bill is verified by the complainant’s agent, who is not also the Solicitor of the complainant, the jurat should state the person verifying to be the agent of the complainant; but where, as in the present case, it is verified by the oath of the complainant’s solicitor, the Court will take notice of that fact from the record and proceedings in the cause.

The motion must be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Walk. Ch. 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bergh-v-poupard-michchanct-1842.