Berger v. United States Life Insurance

158 A.D.2d 440, 551 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1299
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant has offered evidence raising questions of fact concerning possible material misrepresentations regarding the decedent’s health history made in the applications for the life insurance policies shortly before he died. Therefore, summary judgment was properly denied (see, Leamy v Berkshire Life Ins. Co., 39 NY2d 271; Simon v Government Employees Life Ins. Co., 79 AD2d 705; Wittner v IDS Ins. Co., 96 AD2d 1053). In addition, there is a question of fact as to whether the plaintiff and the decedent were indeed business partners as the plaintiff claims. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berger v. United States Life Insurance, 158 A.D.2d 440, 551 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1299 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

158 A.D.2d 440 (Berger v. United States Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hydell v. North Atlantic Life Insurance
246 A.D.2d 511 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Roth v. American International Life Assurance Co.
163 A.D.2d 378 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)