Berger v. United States Life Insurance
This text of 158 A.D.2d 440 (Berger v. United States Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant has offered evidence raising questions of fact concerning possible material misrepresentations regarding the decedent’s health history made in the applications for the life insurance policies shortly before he died. Therefore, summary judgment was properly denied (see, Leamy v Berkshire Life Ins. Co., 39 NY2d 271; Simon v Government Employees Life Ins. Co., 79 AD2d 705; Wittner v IDS Ins. Co., 96 AD2d 1053). In addition, there is a question of fact as to whether the plaintiff and the decedent were indeed business partners as the plaintiff claims. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 A.D.2d 440, 551 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berger-v-united-states-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1990.