Berger v. Leach
This text of 103 A.D.2d 1018 (Berger v. Leach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition in a CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to set aside a determination by respondent Rochester Chief of Police, denying petitioner’s application for a second-hand dealer’s license. Respondent complied with the dictates of section 96-9 of the Rochester Municipal Code when he determined that petitioner was not “a fit and proper person” to hold a license, considering petitioner’s prior activities in the towing business which were the subject of an investigation by both the Rochester Police Department and the State Attorney-General’s office. The law is well settled that a licensing authority has discretion to deny a license application for good cause (see Matter of Barton Trucking Corp. v O’Connell, 7 NY2d 299). The court will intervene only when, as a matter of law, no valid ground exists for denial (Matter of Barton Trucking Corp. v O’Connell, supra, p 308), or when the determination was clearly arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of Howell v Benson, 90 AD2d 903, mot for lv to app den 58 NY2d 611; Matter of Davis v Broderick, 25 AD2d 851). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J. — art 78.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 A.D.2d 1018, 478 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berger-v-leach-nyappdiv-1984.