Berger v. Friese
This text of 45 A.D.2d 734 (Berger v. Friese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding inter alia, to validate petitions nominating the petitioners in this proceeding as candidates in the special election to be held on June 18, 1974 for the public office of Councilman (unexpired term) of the City of White Plains and to direct that their names be placed on the ballot, petitioner Landrigan appeals as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 12, 1974, as directed the respondent City Clerk not to accept his nominating acceptance. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs, and application of petitioner Landrigan granted, without costs. Under the circumstances of this case, we find that there is no rational relationship between the two-year residence requirement and the right to run for the office of Councilman of the City of White Plains. We therefore hold that the two-year residence requirement is unconstitutional and void. In so holding, we do not determine that another and shorter period would not be valid. Gulotta, P. J., Martuscello, Shapiro and Christ, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 A.D.2d 734, 356 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berger-v-friese-nyappdiv-1974.