Berger v. Department of Highways

353 P.2d 612, 143 Colo. 246, 1960 Colo. LEXIS 560
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedMay 31, 1960
Docket19282
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 353 P.2d 612 (Berger v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berger v. Department of Highways, 353 P.2d 612, 143 Colo. 246, 1960 Colo. LEXIS 560 (Colo. 1960).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Plaintiffs in error as plaintiffs brought this action in the district court of the City and County of Denver in which they named the Department of Highways of the State of Colorado as defendant. We will so refer to them.

It was alleged in the complaint that the Department *247 of Highways is obligated by law, “to take care of, patrol, repair, maintain, supervise, control, and otherwise handle the care and maintenance of the highways, byways, roads and land abutting and adjacent thereto, and to control traffic and other conditions existing thereon in the State of Colorado”; that on August 21, 1957, the minor son of plaintiffs was killed while riding in an automobile on state highway No. 6 at a point in Clear Creek canon east of Idaho Springs, Colorado; that the death was caused when a boulder fell from a precipitous bank at the side of the highway striking the car with great force, as a result of which the death ensued. It is further alleged that the Department of Highways, its agents and employees were negligent in failing to guard against the falling of said boulder.

Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. This motion was sustained and judgment entered for defendant. The cause is before this court on writ of error to review that judgment.

This case is in all respects governed by the decision of this court in Faber v. State of Colorado and The Department of Highways, decided this date. Our opinion in that case adheres to the doctrine that no liability attaches in tort actions for injuries sustained by plaintiff which are proximately caused by the negligence of servants of the state or of its agencies.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Hall and Mr. Justice Frantz dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evans v. Board of County Commissioners
482 P.2d 968 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1971)
Smith v. State
473 P.2d 937 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1970)
Tesone v. School Dist. No. Re-2, in County of Boulder
384 P.2d 82 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1963)
State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. Parker
368 P.2d 585 (Utah Supreme Court, 1962)
State v. Morison
365 P.2d 266 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1961)
M. & M. Oil Transportation, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners
353 P.2d 613 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
353 P.2d 612, 143 Colo. 246, 1960 Colo. LEXIS 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berger-v-department-of-highways-colo-1960.