Berger v. Cohen

971 So. 2d 874, 2007 WL 4119176
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 21, 2007
Docket3D06-2978
StatusPublished

This text of 971 So. 2d 874 (Berger v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berger v. Cohen, 971 So. 2d 874, 2007 WL 4119176 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

971 So.2d 874 (2007)

Kimberly BERGER, Appellant,
v.
Scott COHEN, Appellee.

No. 3D06-2978.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 21, 2007.

Laurie D. Hall, for appellant.

Russell H. Cullen and James R. (Jack) Bridges, Key Largo, for appellee.

Before COPE and RAMIREZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Jackson v. Echols, 937 So.2d 1247, 1249 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ("The trial court is afforded broad discretion in granting, denying, dissolving, or modifying injunctions, and unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated, an appellate court must not disturb the trial court's decision.") (citing Wise v. Schmidek, 649 So.2d 336, 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Echols
937 So. 2d 1247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Wise v. Schmidek
649 So. 2d 336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
971 So. 2d 874, 2007 WL 4119176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berger-v-cohen-fladistctapp-2007.