Berger v. CAMERON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

218 S.W.3d 542, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 94
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 23, 2007·No. WD 66196·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

James R. Berger appeals the award of attorney’s fees, as sanctions for discovery violations, and the dismissal of his lawsuit against Cameron Mutual Insurance Company. The trial court first awarded Cameron Mutual Insurance Company attorney’s fees and then later dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 61.01. Due to the numerous discovery violations, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering these sanctions. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berger v. CAMERON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 218 S.W.3d 542, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 94 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

218 S.W.3d 542 (Berger v. CAMERON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tholen v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
218 S.W.3d 542 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)