Berger v. Boston, Worcester & New York Street Railway Co.
This text of 115 N.E.2d 152 (Berger v. Boston, Worcester & New York Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Exceptions overruled. Although
the plaintiff had a verdict in an action of tort for personal injuries he excepts to the exclusion of his questions to his medical expert relating to damages and to a substantial portion of the judge’s charge. It does not appear that he was harmed by the rulings on evidence as there were no offers of proof and the context does not intimate what answers were expected. Crowley v. Appleton, 148 Mass. 98,101. Commonwealth v. Smith, 163 Mass. 411, 429. Coolidge v. Boston Elevated Railway, 214 Mass. 568, 571. Nicholas v. Lewis Furniture Co. 292 Mass. 500, 504. The exception to the charge was general and no alleged errors were specifically brought to the attention of the j udge. Hathaway v. Checker Taxi Co. 321 Mass. 406, 409.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 N.E.2d 152, 330 Mass. 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berger-v-boston-worcester-new-york-street-railway-co-mass-1953.