Berger v. Board of Standards & Appeals

277 A.D.2d 1142

Opinion

In- a proceeding to review a determination of the board of standards and appeals of the City of New York, denying respondent’s application for a variance of the provisions of the zoning resolution, order of the Special Term reversed on the law and the facts, with $50 costs and disbursements, the board’s motion to vacate the order of certiorari granted, and the board’s determination unanimously confirmed. The Special Term arrogated to itself the powers of the board. The determination of the board has support in the evidence; it is not arbitrary; and it may not and should not be disturbed. (Matter of Ernest v. Board of Appeals on Zoning of New Rochelle, 274 App. Div. 809.) But see Arverne Bay Constr. Co. v. Thatcher (278 N. Y. 222). Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berger v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 277 A.D.2d 1142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

277 A.D.2d 1142 (Berger v. Board of Standards & Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. Thatcher
15 N.E.2d 587 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)
Ernst v. Board of Appeals on Zoning of the City of New Rochelle
274 A.D. 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)