Bergen v. Ward
This text of 272 A.D.2d 1025 (Bergen v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants moved to dismiss the complaint under subdivision 6 of ride 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on. the ground that the action was not instituted within the time limited by law. The motion was denied, and defendants appeal. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. (Mulligan v. County of Westchester, 272 App. Div. 929, on reargument 272 App. Div. 1023, decided Oct. 20, 1947; Amex Asphalt Corp. V. City of New York, 263 App. Div. 968, affd. 288 N. Y. 721; General Municipal Law, § 50-e; L. 1941, ch. 777, § 10.) Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bergen-v-ward-nyappdiv-1947.