Bergen v. Rogers

70 A. 1100, 74 N.J. Eq. 452, 4 Buchanan 452, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 277
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 15, 1908
StatusPublished

This text of 70 A. 1100 (Bergen v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bergen v. Rogers, 70 A. 1100, 74 N.J. Eq. 452, 4 Buchanan 452, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 277 (N.J. 1908).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in' the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Garrison in the court below.

[453]*453For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgii, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill — 12. For reversal — Swayze, Trenoi-iard, Parker — 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 A. 1100, 74 N.J. Eq. 452, 4 Buchanan 452, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bergen-v-rogers-nj-1908.