Bergen v. Bergen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bergen v. Bergen

272 A.D.2d 1038

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1038 (Bergen v. Bergen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bergen v. Bergen, 272 A.D.2d 1038 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Dore, J.

(dissenting). On this record, issues of fact are raised as to whether the written contract was part of a general unlawful agreement to facilitate a divorce and was given for an illegal consideration (Domestic Relations Law, § 51; Murthey v. Murthey, 287 N. Y. 740; Matter of Hellwig, 178 Misc. 510, 511, affd. 265 App. Div. 998, motion for leave to appeal dismissed 290 N. Y. 743). Accordingly, we dissent and vote to reverse the order of the Appellate Term affirming the order and judgment of the Municipal Court, and said order and judgment and to deny plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

Peck, P. J., Glennon and Cohn, JJ.; concur in decision; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse in opinion in which Callahan, J., concurs.

Determination affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dore, J.

(dissenting). On this record, issues of fact are raised as to whether the written contract was part of a general unlawful agreement to facilitate a divorce and was given for an illegal consideration (Domestic Relations Law, § 51; Murthey v. Murthey, 287 N. Y. 740; Matter of Hellwig, 178 Misc. 510, 511, affd. 265 App. Div. 998, motion for leave to appeal dismissed 290 N. Y. 743). Accordingly, we dissent and vote to reverse the order of the Appellate Term affirming the order and judgment of the Municipal Court, and said order and judgment and to deny plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

Peck, P. J., Glennon and Cohn, JJ.; concur in decision; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse in opinion in which Callahan, J., concurs.

Determination affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bergen-v-bergen-nyappdiv-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack