Bergen v. Bennett

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 370

This text of 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 370 (Bergen v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bergen v. Bennett, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 370 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Opinion

The Court of Errors reversed this decision. The opinion of the court was delivered by Kent, J. He says, “ It is admitted that a naked authority expires with the life of the person who gave it; but a power coupled with an interest is not revoked by the death of the grantor. In my opinion the power contained in the mortgage is of the latter description.” He also held, “ That the heir was barred of the right to redeem under the circumstances, having waited without any legal disability sixteen years, and only when finding it a gaining bargain, presenting himself to redeem.” The decree of the Chancellor was reversed, and the bill to redeem ordered to be dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bergen-v-bennett-nycterr-1799.