Bergemann v. State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bergemann v. State Liquor Authority

249 A.D. 737, 291 N.Y.S. 696, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5806

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 737 (Bergemann v. State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bergemann v. State Liquor Authority, 249 A.D. 737, 291 N.Y.S. 696, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting certiorari order so that a determination of the defendant State Liquor Authority might be reviewed according to law and staying said Authority until the final determination of the certiorari proceedings modified by limiting the stay to thirty days as prescribed by section 121 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, and as so modified affirmed, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants. The court was without power to grant a stay for a period longer than that prescribed by the statute. (Bertholf v. O’Reilly, 74 N. Y. 509; People ex rel. Crane v. Hahlo, 228 id. 309.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting certiorari order so that a determination of the defendant State Liquor Authority might be reviewed according to law and staying said Authority until the final determination of the certiorari proceedings modified by limiting the stay to thirty days as prescribed by section 121 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, and as so modified affirmed, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants. The court was without power to grant a stay for a period longer than that prescribed by the statute. (Bertholf v. O’Reilly, 74 N. Y. 509; People ex rel. Crane v. Hahlo, 228 id. 309.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 737, 291 N.Y.S. 696, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bergemann-v-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack