Bergdoll v. Pitts

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Bergdoll v. Pitts

41 Pa. Super. 264, 1909 Pa. Super. LEXIS 47

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 13, 1909

DocketNo. 3; Appeal, No. 84

StatusPublished

This text of 41 Pa. Super. 264 (Bergdoll v. Pitts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bergdoll v. Pitts, 41 Pa. Super. 264, 1909 Pa. Super. LEXIS 47 (Pa. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This record presents only the same questions which were considered in the appeal of this defendant, in the case of Charles A. Bergdoll, guardian, v. Lillie H. Pitts, in which an opinion has this day been filed, ante, p. 257. The specifications of error are overruled for the reasons stated in that opinion.

The judgment is affirmed and the appeal dismissed.

Henderson and Morrison, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This record presents only the same questions which were considered in the appeal of this defendant, in the case of Charles A. Bergdoll, guardian, v. Lillie H. Pitts, in which an opinion has this day been filed, ante, p. 257. The specifications of error are overruled for the reasons stated in that opinion.

The judgment is affirmed and the appeal dismissed.

Henderson and Morrison, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 Pa. Super. 264, 1909 Pa. Super. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bergdoll-v-pitts-pasuperct-1909.