Berg v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 290
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Berg v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 Cust. Ct. 324 →
United States Customs Court·Decided December 27, 1961·No. No. 66315; protest 60/31099 (Los Angeles)·Published
Opinion
[291]*291Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Berg v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 290 (cusc 1961).
48 Cust. Ct. 290 (Berg v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Co.
47 C.C.P.A. 1 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1959)