Berg v. Moore

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Berg v. Moore

7 Pa. 94, 1847 Pa. LEXIS 215

DecidedNovember 1, 1847

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Pa. 94 (Berg v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berg v. Moore, 7 Pa. 94, 1847 Pa. LEXIS 215 (Pa. 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is settled by Knisley v. Shenberger, 7 Watts, 194, that a writ of error does not lie to the opinion of the Common Pleas on a question of error alleged to have been committed by arbitrators. The present is, in effect, a writ of error to the arbitrators; for the errors assigned are theirs, and not the errors of the court. But we can reverse only for error in the judgment — not in the award.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It is settled by Knisley v. Shenberger, 7 Watts, 194, that a writ of error does not lie to the opinion of the Common Pleas on a question of error alleged to have been committed by arbitrators. The present is, in effect, a writ of error to the arbitrators; for the errors assigned are theirs, and not the errors of the court. But we can reverse only for error in the judgment — not in the award.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Pa. 94, 1847 Pa. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berg-v-moore-pa-1847.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack