Berg v. Moore

7 Pa. 94, 1847 Pa. LEXIS 215
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 1, 1847·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is settled by Knisley v. Shenberger, 7 Watts, 194, that a writ of error does not lie to the opinion of the Common Pleas on a question of error alleged to have been committed by arbitrators. The present is, in effect, a writ of error to the arbitrators; for the errors assigned are theirs, and not the errors of the court. But we can reverse only for error in the judgment — not in the award.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berg v. Moore, 7 Pa. 94, 1847 Pa. LEXIS 215 (Pa. 1847).

7 Pa. 94 (Berg v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knisely v. Shenberger
7 Watts 193 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1838)