Berg v. Moore
7 Pa. 94, 1847 Pa. LEXIS 215
Opinion
It is settled by Knisley v. Shenberger, 7 Watts, 194, that a writ of error does not lie to the opinion of the Common Pleas on a question of error alleged to have been committed by arbitrators. The present is, in effect, a writ of error to the arbitrators; for the errors assigned are theirs, and not the errors of the court. But we can reverse only for error in the judgment — not in the award.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Berg v. Moore, 7 Pa. 94, 1847 Pa. LEXIS 215 (Pa. 1847).
7 Pa. 94 (Berg v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Knisely v. Shenberger
7 Watts 193 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1838)