Berg v. MIDWEST LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION

124 N.W.2d 699, 175 Neb. 874, 1963 Neb. LEXIS 234
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided November 22, 1963·No. 35409·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Boslaugh, J.

The appellee, Midwest Laundry Equipment Corp., has filed a motion for rehearing in which it contends that the appellants are not entitled to recover the amounts paid to it upon the contract for the purchase of the laundry equipment even though the contract is void. This question was not raised in the briefs or argument in this court until the motion for rehearing was filed.

Upon further consideration of the matter, we are now of the opinion that the cause should be remanded to the district court with directions to determine the amount of the payments made by the appellants to the Midwest Laundry Equipment Corp. and whether the appellants *875 should recover this amount from the Midwest Laundry Equipment Corp. in view of our determination concerning the validity of that contract.

Our opinion in this case filed on June 14, 1963, is modified accordingly. The motion for rehearing is overruled.

Original opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berg v. MIDWEST LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, 124 N.W.2d 699, 175 Neb. 874, 1963 Neb. LEXIS 234 (Neb. 1963).

124 N.W.2d 699 (Berg v. MIDWEST LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Draemel v. Rufenacht, Bromagen & Hertz, Inc.
392 N.W.2d 759 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
Kasselder v. Kapperman
316 N.W.2d 628 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1982)
Berg v. Midwest Laundry Equipment Corp.
135 N.W.2d 457 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965)