Berg v. Just Because, Inc.

205 A.D. 33, 199 N.Y.S. 68
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Berg v. Just Because, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 205 A.D. 31

Opinion

Smith, J.:

This action is for the recovery of subsequent installments under the same contract involved in action No. 1, between the same parties. (Berg v. Just Because, Inc., No. 1, 205 App. Div. 31.)

[34]*34Following the conclusion reached in action No. 1, decided herewith, the determination of the Appellate Term and the judgment of the Municipal Court should be reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts.

Dowling, Meeeell, Finch and McAvoy, JJ., concur.

Determination of Appellate Term and judgment of Municipal Court reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs to appellant in all courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berg v. Just Because, Inc., 205 A.D. 33, 199 N.Y.S. 68 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

205 A.D. 33 (Berg v. Just Because, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Berg v. Just Because, Inc.
205 A.D. 31 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)