Berg v. Berg
This text of 634 A.2d 1174 (Berg v. Berg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
This matter came before this court on December 9, 1993 pursuant to an order requiring the defendant to appear and to show cause why her appeal should not be summarily decided.
The defendant appeals a Family Court decision pending final judgment. After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties, it is the conclusion of this court that cause has not been shown. Based upon the testimony and evidence before the trial justice, we find his distribution of the marital assets just and fair. Wordell v. Wordell, 470 A.2d 666, 667 (R.I.1984). There was not an abuse of discretion.
The ruling of the trial justice is affirmed and the defendant’s appeal is denied and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
634 A.2d 1174, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 272, 1993 WL 536857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berg-v-berg-ri-1993.