Berg v. Berg

Missouri Court of Appeals

Berg v. Berg

359 S.W.3d 131, 2011 WL 6755924, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1731

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 2011·No. WD 72917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Andrew Berg appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Jackson County denying his motion to modify the decree dissolving his marriage to Kristin Berg. In his motion, Mr. Berg sought to terminate his obligation to pay maintenance to Mrs. Berg. After a thorough re *132 view of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Andrew Berg appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Jackson County denying his motion to modify the decree dissolving his marriage to Kristin Berg. In his motion, Mr. Berg sought to terminate his obligation to pay maintenance to Mrs. Berg. After a thorough re *132 view of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Berg v. Berg, 359 S.W.3d 131, 2011 WL 6755924, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1731 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

359 S.W.3d 131 (Berg v. Berg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related