Berg v. Baldwin

93 A. 1084, 84 N.J. Eq. 193, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 368
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 1, 1915·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams-15. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berg v. Baldwin, 93 A. 1084, 84 N.J. Eq. 193, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 368 (N.J. 1915).

93 A. 1084 (Berg v. Baldwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ellis v. Ellis
111 A.2d 432 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Vanderbach v. Vollinger
64 A.2d 225 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)
Grabow v. Gelber
49 A.2d 431 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)