Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Berg v. Baldwin

Berg v. Baldwin

93 A. 1084, 84 N.J. Eq. 193, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 368
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 1, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 93 A. 1084 (Berg v. Baldwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berg v. Baldwin, 93 A. 1084, 84 N.J. Eq. 193, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 368 (N.J. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams-15. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ellis v. Ellis
111 A.2d 432 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Vanderbach v. Vollinger
64 A.2d 225 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)
Grabow v. Gelber
49 A.2d 431 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 A. 1084, 84 N.J. Eq. 193, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berg-v-baldwin-nj-1915.