Berezovsky v. State

351 So. 2d 764
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 10, 1977
DocketNo. 75-490
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 351 So. 2d 764 (Berezovsky v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berezovsky v. State, 351 So. 2d 764 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on May 18,1976 (335 So.2d 592) affirming the judgment and sentence of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed September 15, 1977, 350 So.2d 80 and mandate now lodged in this court, affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded the cause for resentencing.

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on August 10, 1976 is withdrawn the judgment of this court filed in this cause on May 18, 1976, except as is affirmed by the judgment of the Supreme Court dated September 15, 1977, is vacated and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court. The judgment and sentence appealed from herein is reversed in part and affirmed in part and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with the views expressed herein. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16b Florida Appellate Rules).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flowers v. State
351 So. 2d 764 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
351 So. 2d 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berezovsky-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.