Bereuter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bereuter v. State

823 S.W.2d 48, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1620, 1991 WL 219599

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 29, 1991·No. No. 59058·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Gerald Bereuter, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the transcripts of the proceedings below, the legal file and the briefs of the parties and find that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we also find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a full opinion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been provided, solely for the use of the parties here involved, explaining the reasons for our holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Gerald Bereuter, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the transcripts of the proceedings below, the legal file and the briefs of the parties and find that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we also find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a full opinion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been provided, solely for the use of the parties here involved, explaining the reasons for our holding.

Bereuter v. State, 823 S.W.2d 48, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1620, 1991 WL 219599 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

823 S.W.2d 48 (Bereuter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.