Berenzweig v. Krecun

Appellate Court of Illinois

Berenzweig v. Krecun

188 Ill. App. 586

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 7, 1914

DocketGen. No. 19,355

StatusPublished

This text of 188 Ill. App. 586 (Berenzweig v. Krecun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berenzweig v. Krecun, 188 Ill. App. 586 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Breach oe marriage promise, § 23*—when issue properly submitted to jury. In a suit for breach of a promise to marry, where plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that defendant promised in December to marry her the following May and that she expressed her willingness to then marry him, and defendant’s evidence tended to show that he did not so promise to marry plaintiff, held that the case was properly submitted to the jury on such issue and that a verdict for plaintiff was sustained by the evidence, it appearing that the facts and circumstances in evidence, other than direct testimony of the parties, tended to corroborate the plaintiff rather than the defendant. 4. Appeal and ebboe, § 370*—when objection that suit was prematurely brought will not be considered. An objection that the suit was prematurely brought cannot be raised for the first time in the Appellate Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Breach oe marriage promise, § 23*—when issue properly submitted to jury. In a suit for breach of a promise to marry, where plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that defendant promised in December to marry her the following May and that she expressed her willingness to then marry him, and defendant’s evidence tended to show that he did not so promise to marry plaintiff, held that the case was properly submitted to the jury on such issue and that a verdict for plaintiff was sustained by the evidence, it appearing that the facts and circumstances in evidence, other than direct testimony of the parties, tended to corroborate the plaintiff rather than the defendant. 4. Appeal and ebboe, § 370*—when objection that suit was prematurely brought will not be considered. An objection that the suit was prematurely brought cannot be raised for the first time in the Appellate Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 Ill. App. 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berenzweig-v-krecun-illappct-1914.