Berendt v. Ripps

47 S.E. 595, 120 Ga. 228, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 517
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 13, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 47 S.E. 595 (Berendt v. Ripps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berendt v. Ripps, 47 S.E. 595, 120 Ga. 228, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 517 (Ga. 1904).

Opinion

Eish, P. 3.

In a suit upon an absolute and unconditional promissory note, the court, in the absence of an issuable plea filed under oath, rendered an absolute judgment for the plaintiff, agreeing at the time, however, to open the judgment if the defendant would, within ten days thereafter,file “a suf. ficient answer in law to said suit,” and within the time the defendant filed a plea which sought to vary the terms of the note, by engrafting upon it a condition made by a parol contemporaneous agreement, and thereupon moved to open the judgment. Held, that there was no error in refusing to grant the motion. Civil Code, §8675, par. 1.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Complaint. Before Judge Norwood. City court of Savannah. December 1, 1903. W. H. Boyd and Twiggs & Oliver, for plantiff in error. George W. Owens, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cole v. Bank of Bowersville
120 S.E. 790 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Kerr v. Holder
78 S.E. 682 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 S.E. 595, 120 Ga. 228, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berendt-v-ripps-ga-1904.