Berendt v. Ripps

47 S.E. 595, 120 Ga. 228, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 517
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 13, 1904·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Eish, P. 3.

In a suit upon an absolute and unconditional promissory note, the court, in the absence of an issuable plea filed under oath, rendered an absolute judgment for the plaintiff, agreeing at the time, however, to open the judgment if the defendant would, within ten days thereafter,file “a suf. ficient answer in law to said suit,” and within the time the defendant filed a plea which sought to vary the terms of the note, by engrafting upon it a condition made by a parol contemporaneous agreement, and thereupon moved to open the judgment. Held, that there was no error in refusing to grant the motion. Civil Code, §8675, par. 1.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Complaint. Before Judge Norwood. City court of Savannah. December 1, 1903. W. H. Boyd and Twiggs & Oliver, for plantiff in error. George W. Owens, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berendt v. Ripps, 47 S.E. 595, 120 Ga. 228, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 517 (Ga. 1904).

47 S.E. 595 (Berendt v. Ripps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cole v. Bank of Bowersville
120 S.E. 790 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Kerr v. Holder
78 S.E. 682 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)