Berend v. Miley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berend v. Miley

248 A.D. 717

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion for judgment dismissing the amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days after service, [718]*718of order upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendant’s motion for judgment dismissing the amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days after service, [718]*718of order upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Berend v. Miley, 248 A.D. 717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 717 (Berend v. Miley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.