Berend v. Miley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berend v. Miley

248 A.D. 717

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 717 (Berend v. Miley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berend v. Miley, 248 A.D. 717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion for judgment dismissing the amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days after service, [718]*718of order upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendant’s motion for judgment dismissing the amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days after service, [718]*718of order upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berend-v-miley-nyappdiv-1936.