Berbick v. Reasbeck

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Berbick v. Reasbeck

575 So. 2d 805, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2102, 1991 WL 32130

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 13, 1991

DocketNo. 90-3268

StatusPublished

This text of 575 So. 2d 805 (Berbick v. Reasbeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berbick v. Reasbeck, 575 So. 2d 805, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2102, 1991 WL 32130 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of prohibition, having concluded that the petitioner’s allegations are sufficient to support her motion for disqualification. We have limited our examination of the petitioner’s alleged grounds for disqualification to a determination of whether those grounds might give rise to a reasonable concern by petitioner of the trial court’s treatment of her claims. See Livingston v. State, 441 So.2d 1083 (Fla.1983).

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of prohibition, having concluded that the petitioner’s allegations are sufficient to support her motion for disqualification. We have limited our examination of the petitioner’s alleged grounds for disqualification to a determination of whether those grounds might give rise to a reasonable concern by petitioner of the trial court’s treatment of her claims. See Livingston v. State, 441 So.2d 1083 (Fla.1983).

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

575 So. 2d 805, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2102, 1991 WL 32130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berbick-v-reasbeck-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack