Berberich Vs. Dist. Ct. (S. Highlands Cmty. Ass'N)

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 20, 2020
Docket82079
StatusPublished

This text of Berberich Vs. Dist. Ct. (S. Highlands Cmty. Ass'N) (Berberich Vs. Dist. Ct. (S. Highlands Cmty. Ass'N)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berberich Vs. Dist. Ct. (S. Highlands Cmty. Ass'N), (Neb. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

KENNETH BERBERICH, TRUSTEE, No. 82079 ON BEHALD OF 4499 WEITZMAN PLACE TRUST, A NEVADA TRUST; JEFF BRAUER, ESQ.; AND BRAUER, DRISCOLL, SUN AND ASSOCIATES FILED LLC, Petitioners, NOV 2 0 2020 vs. . A. BROWN ..UPREME COU THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, DE TY CLERK

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE JOANNA KISHNER, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, A NEVADA NON-PROFIT CORPORATION; MTC FINANCIAL, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION REGISTERED IN NEVADA; OLYMPIA GROUP, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION; OLYMPIA MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION; FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, A FEDERALLY CHARTERED CORPORATION; AND CAM REAL ESTATE XIV, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Real Parties in Interest.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

10) I947A .ato 2,0 -caq7cP

EMI ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original petition for a writ of rnandamus seeks to compel the respondent district judge to hear petitioners post-judgment motion for relief, rather than the judge to whom the case is currently assigned, and to have vacated prior orders entered by the currently assigned judge. Having reviewed the petition and supporting documents, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted. NRS 34.160; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (recognizing that petitioners bear the burden to demonstrate that writ relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). In particular, petitioners fail to demonstrate that NRS 175.101, a criminal procedure statute recently addressed in Harvey u. State, 136 Nev., Adv. Op. 61, 473 P.3d 1015 (2020), applies to their civil case below. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

04:-‘14e/i) - Hardesty Silver

cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge Spencer M. Judd Aldridge Pite, LLP Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP/Las Vegas Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP Kemp, Jones, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT oF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 440.

11""'114 7 47; v .AL

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Berberich Vs. Dist. Ct. (S. Highlands Cmty. Ass'N), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berberich-vs-dist-ct-s-highlands-cmty-assn-nev-2020.