Home/Washington Supreme Court/Berbells v. Davis

Berbells v. Davis

9 P.2d 789, 167 Wash. 472, 1932 Wash. LEXIS 656
Washington Supreme Court·Decided April 4, 1932·No. No. 23572. Department One.·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a civil action at law for the recovery of one hundred thirty dollars rent, alleged to be due under the terms of a written lease. The defendants sought no affirmative relief. There was judgment for plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred thirty dollars. Defendants gave notice of appeal.

*473 Under Article IV, § 4, of the state constitution, the appellate jurisdiction of the supreme court does not extend to this kind of civil action at law, when the original amount in controversy does not exceed the sum of two hundred dollars.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berbells v. Davis, 9 P.2d 789, 167 Wash. 472, 1932 Wash. LEXIS 656 (Wash. 1932).

9 P.2d 789 (Berbells v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griego v. Rodriguez
New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2010
Malstrom v. Kalland
384 P.2d 613 (Washington Supreme Court, 1963)
Smith v. Laughlin
321 P.2d 907 (Washington Supreme Court, 1958)
Kramer v. Portland-Seattle Auto Freight, Inc.
261 P.2d 692 (Washington Supreme Court, 1953)
Anderson v. Dalton
246 P.2d 853 (Washington Supreme Court, 1952)
Kellerher v. Porter
189 P.2d 223 (Washington Supreme Court, 1948)
Herndon v. City of Seattle
118 P.2d 421 (Washington Supreme Court, 1941)
Jamieson v. Taylor
95 P.2d 791 (Washington Supreme Court, 1939)
Delsman v. Bertotti
93 P.2d 371 (Washington Supreme Court, 1939)
Gibson v. Spokane United Railways
84 P.2d 349 (Washington Supreme Court, 1938)
Ries v. Cheyenne Cab & Transfer Co.
79 P.2d 468 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1938)
Harry v. Beatty
31 P.2d 97 (Washington Supreme Court, 1934)
Eggert v. Schumacher
22 P.2d 52 (Washington Supreme Court, 1933)