Berardini v. Tocci
200 F. 1021, 118 C.C.A. 659, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1932
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 9, 1912·No. No. 44·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
The patent is in reality,, as Judge Hough well expressed it, for a system of devising code messages. It is very similar to the system of transacting business in a restaurant which was considered by this court in Hotel Security Co. v. Lorraine, 160 Fed. 469, 87 C. C. A. 451, 24 L. R. A. (N. S.) 665. It seems unnecessary to add anything to the opinion of the District Court. The decree is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Berardini v. Tocci, 200 F. 1021, 118 C.C.A. 659, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1932 (2d Cir. 1912).
200 F. 1021 (Berardini v. Tocci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
564 F. Supp. 1358 (D. Delaware, 1983)
In Re Patton
127 F.2d 324 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1942)
In Re Dixon
44 F.2d 881 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1930)
Guthrie v. Curlett
10 F.2d 725 (Second Circuit, 1926)