Berardi v. Norwest Bank, Minnesota, NA (In re Goff Building, LLC)

73 F. App'x 593
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2003·No. No. 03-1184·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Jerry A. Berardi and Betty J. Berardi appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying their motion to remand their case [594] back to the state court and denying their motion for leave to amend their complaint. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix and supplement to the joint appendix, and the lower courts’ opinions and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Berardi v. Norwest Bank Minn., NA, Nos. CA-2-50-1; BK-99-12207; AP-00-1195 (N.D.W Va. Jan. 23, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berardi v. Norwest Bank, Minnesota, NA (In re Goff Building, LLC), 73 F. App'x 593 (4th Cir. 2003).

73 F. App'x 593 (Berardi v. Norwest Bank, Minnesota, NA (In re Goff Building, LLC)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.