Berall v. Verathon Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMarch 4, 2021
Docket1:10-cv-05777
StatusUnknown

This text of Berall v. Verathon Inc. (Berall v. Verathon Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berall v. Verathon Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Opinion

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AFFILIATED PARTNERSHIPS 601 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 Christopher DeCoro United States To Call Writer Directly: Facsimile: +1212 446 4859 +1212 446 4800 +1212 446 4900 cdecoro@kirkland.com www.kirkland.com

Filed via ECF March 3, 2021 The Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Judge, Southern District of New York United States Courthouse, Courtroom 12A 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: — Berall vy. Verathon, Inc. et al., C.A. No. 1:10-cv-05777-LAP-DCF Honorable Judge Preska: We represent Plaintiff Jonathan Berall, M.D., M.P.H, in the above-referenced matter. Pursuant to Your Honor’s Individual Practices, Plaintiff seeks an order permitting to file under seal the following documents: e Anunredacted copy of Plaintiff's Response to Teleflex’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on March 3, 2021; e An unredacted copy of Plaintiff's Response to Teleflex’s Statement of Undisputed Facts and Dr. Berall’s Statement of Additional Materials Facts filed on March 3, 2021; e Anunredacted copy of the Declaration of Dr. Jonathan Berall, filed on March 3, 2021; e Exhibits 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 6.1, and 6.2 to the Declaration of Christopher DeCoro, filed on March 3, 2021. The redacted sections of the documents listed above include confidential settlement information, including a settlement agreement with confidentiality provisions, financial information, and confidential communications between the parties. Courts in this district have recognized that settlement agreements and financial information are appropriate for redaction. See, e.g., Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd v. P3 Int’l Co., 2018 WL 4759744, 16-cv-6276, Dkt. 164, at 26-27 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2018). The redactions also include excerpts from documents this Court has already permitted the parties to file under seal. See Dkts. 226, 254. Accordingly, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter an order that its Responsive Motion, Statement and Exhibits 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 6.1, and 6.2 to the Declaration of Christopher DeCoro may be filed under seal.

Beijing Boston Chicago Dallas HongKong Houston London Los Angeles Munich PaloAlto Paris SanFrancisco Shanghai Washington, D.C.

The Honorable Loretta A. Preska — March 3, 2021 Page 2

Sincerely, /s/ Christopher DeCoro Christopher DeCoro

ce: Counsel of Record The request to file the above documents under seal is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 4, 2021 New York, New York weittla lh Yuewlg LORETTA A. PRESKA, U.S.D.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Berall v. Verathon Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berall-v-verathon-inc-nysd-2021.