Benzien v. Lovelass
This text of 1 N.C. 520 (Benzien v. Lovelass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—I think it but reasonable to grant the leave prayed; but surely it must be granted upon payment of the costs incurred by the copies of the amended bill which issued, and were served on persons whom they now chuse to consider as strangers to the bill at that time. This was their own act; and although they may eventually succeed in the cause, yet it would be very unreasonable to make the defendants pay the costs of those copies. I am clearly of opinion they must pay all the costs which have arisen in consequence of the omission they now wish to amend, by making the same persons defendants.
By the Court.—The complainants must pay the costs of the copies which issued improperly against the persons now prayed to be parties—but no attorney’s fee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.C. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benzien-v-lovelass-nc-1804.