Benz & Cie v. Froehlich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Benz & Cie v. Froehlich

163 A.D. 941

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.D. 941 (Benz & Cie v. Froehlich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benz & Cie v. Froehlich, 163 A.D. 941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified by allowing the defendant either to join in the commission with written cross-interrogatories or to attend and cross-examine the witnesses orally as he shall elect. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Present—• Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified by allowing the defendant either to join in the commission with written cross-interrogatories or to attend and cross-examine the witnesses orally as he shall elect. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Present—• Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A.D. 941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benz-cie-v-froehlich-nyappdiv-1914.