Benvie v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.

156 P. 266, 79 Or. 639, 1916 Ore. LEXIS 214
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 28, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 P. 266 (Benvie v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benvie v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co., 156 P. 266, 79 Or. 639, 1916 Ore. LEXIS 214 (Or. 1916).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Benson

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. There are several assignments of error, but we shall consider but one, and that is the action of the court in denying the motion for a judgment of non-suit. It will be observed that the proximate cause of the accident is alleged to be that by reason of the great [641]*641distance between the step and the ground, “before plaintiff’s foot reached the ground, all of her weight was thrown upon the limb remaining upon the said step, and as a result thereof the tendons, muscles and flesh of plaintiff’s said limb gave way and were torn, bruised, wrenched and twisted.” It is an indisputable physical fact that, so far as this allegation goes, the entire weight would have been thrown upon the limb remaining upon the step even if the latter had been within four inches of the ground, or, indeed, even if plaintiff had been walking upon a level surface, and therefore, without some further recital of facts than as disclosed by the pleading, the height of the step could not have had anything to do with the result, and the complaint does not state facts constituting a cause of action.

We therefore conclude that it was error to deny the motion for judgment of nonsuit.

The judgment will be reversed, and a judgment of nonsuit entered here without prejudice.

Reversed.

Mr. Chief Justice Moore, Mr. Justice Burnett and Mr. Justice McBride concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claussen v. Amberg
1926 OK 681 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 P. 266, 79 Or. 639, 1916 Ore. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benvie-v-portland-ry-l-p-co-or-1916.