Home/California Supreme Court/Benvenuto v. Superior Court

Benvenuto v. Superior Court

181 Cal. 293
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 25, 1919
DocketL. A. No. 6292
StatusPublished

This text of 181 Cal. 293 (Benvenuto v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benvenuto v. Superior Court, 181 Cal. 293 (Cal. 1919).

Opinion

THE COURT.

The application for a writ of prohibition is denied.

[1] We deem it proper to say that this denial is without reference to the merits of the legal question attempted to be presented by the application. Regardless of all other questions, we cannot assume to anticipate the action of the trial court on the application for confirmation of the attempted sale referred to in the petition.

It may further be suggested that we are not satisfied that in the event of unfavorable action on the part of the lower court the petitioner’s remedy by appeal would not be a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy.

All the Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 Cal. 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benvenuto-v-superior-court-cal-1919.