Bentz v. Oldham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Bentz v. Oldham

1920 OK 302, 192 P. 567, 79 Okla. 210, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 69

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 14, 1920

Docket9966

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK 302 (Bentz v. Oldham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bentz v. Oldham, 1920 OK 302, 192 P. 567, 79 Okla. 210, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 69 (Okla. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

HARRISON, J.

In the above entitled cause motion for new trial was overruled on November 24, 1917, and final judgment rendered and 90 days given plaintiff in error in which to make and serve case-made. The 90 days expired without the completion of service of case-made and without any extension of time in which to make and serve same, and without any application on the part of plaintiff in error for an extension of time.

There is, therefore, no duly authenticated case-made by virtue of which the jurisdiction of this court would attach to the subject-matter, and as there is no duly certified transcript of record by which this court would be authorized to pass upon the issues of law raised, the case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

All the Justices coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARRISON, J.

In the above entitled cause motion for new trial was overruled on November 24, 1917, and final judgment rendered and 90 days given plaintiff in error in which to make and serve case-made. The 90 days expired without the completion of service of case-made and without any extension of time in which to make and serve same, and without any application on the part of plaintiff in error for an extension of time.

There is, therefore, no duly authenticated case-made by virtue of which the jurisdiction of this court would attach to the subject-matter, and as there is no duly certified transcript of record by which this court would be authorized to pass upon the issues of law raised, the case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

All the Justices coneur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK 302, 192 P. 567, 79 Okla. 210, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bentz-v-oldham-okla-1920.