Benton v. U.S. Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Benton v. U.S. Bank

171 So. 3d 764, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10838, 2015 WL 4385596

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 17, 2015

Docket2D14-805

StatusPublished

This text of 171 So. 3d 764 (Benton v. U.S. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benton v. U.S. Bank, 171 So. 3d 764, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10838, 2015 WL 4385596 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

BLACK, Judge.

Robert Benton and Heather Stokes challenge the order denying a “renewed” motion to set aside foreclosure sale. As to Mr. Benton, we affirm. See, e.g., Huddle House v. Peralta, 754 So.2d 753, 753-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (affirming order on appeal due to appellant’s failure to file an adequate appendix despite being directed to do so pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220). As to Ms. Stokes, we dismiss the appeal. See Quinones v. Se. Inv. Grp. Corp., 138 So.3d 549, 549-50 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (dismissing appeal of foreclosure final judgment where appellants had no standing to appeal the final judgment and otherwise failed to seek timely review of the order denying the motion to intervene).

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

CRENSHAW and SLEET, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLACK, Judge.

Robert Benton and Heather Stokes challenge the order denying a “renewed” motion to set aside foreclosure sale. As to Mr. Benton, we affirm. See, e.g., Huddle House v. Peralta, 754 So.2d 753, 753-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (affirming order on appeal due to appellant’s failure to file an adequate appendix despite being directed to do so pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220). As to Ms. Stokes, we dismiss the appeal. See Quinones v. Se. Inv. Grp. Corp., 138 So.3d 549, 549-50 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (dismissing appeal of foreclosure final judgment where appellants had no standing to appeal the final judgment and otherwise failed to seek timely review of the order denying the motion to intervene).

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

CRENSHAW and SLEET, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 So. 3d 764, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10838, 2015 WL 4385596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benton-v-us-bank-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack