Benton v. State

330 So. 2d 203, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14971
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 14, 1976·No. No. 75-1376·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged in a two-count information with assault to murder (first degree) with a deadly weapon and having or using a firearm while in the commission of a felony. Appellant pled nolo contendere to both counts. Following a presentence investigation, the court adjudicated appellant guilty and sentenced him to five years imprisonment as to Count One (assault to murder). The trial judge adjudged appellant guilty as to Count Two (use of firearm) and, noting that the sentence in Count Two would be merged into the sentence on Count One, placed Count Two on the absentee docket.

The firearm used in commission of the offense charged in Count Two was the same weapon used during the commission of the assault charged in Count One. It is now well settled by case law of this state that where two offenses are facets of the same criminal transaction, the court can only impose one sentence and that for the higher offense after conviction for both offenses. Hence, any sentence imposed as to Count Two is improper.

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to correct its records by deleting from the judgment and sentence the reference as to Count Two being placed on the absentee docket. In all other respects the judgments and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benton v. State, 330 So. 2d 203, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14971 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

330 So. 2d 203 (Benton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farmer v. State
330 So. 2d 842 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)